This is a sample report, built from an example chat between two people who do not exist. Yours would read like this.Start your own

Vikram

WhatsApp export·6 Jul – 11 Aug 2024·45 messages·timestamps present
Where this stands

Warm, and not going anywhere.

Vikram is keeping this going. He is not moving it forward. Seven plans were made here and none of them happened.

You sent 13 messages into those silences. Each time, the one who reopened it was you.

6 Jul10 Aug
Vikram, above the lineyou, below itquiet for more than 72 hours
Does what he says
0
7 plans proposed, none kept
Stays around
17
5 silences over 72 hours across 6 weeks
Answers you
0
1 direct question about where this is going, none answered straight
Shares the effort
71
you started 9 of 14 conversations

Across the 4 readings this chat could show, 22 out of 100. Every number here is counted from the messages themselves, not judged.

You send 25 of the 45 messages, and 9 of the 14 conversations start with you.

What we counted
9 of 14
conversations you started
2.6
messages you sent during each of Vikram's silences
13 messages across 5 silences.
4 min
your median reply time
Vikram: 4 h 55.
1
direct question you asked about where things stand
3 Aug
0
limits you stated
16%
of your messages after 11 pm
Vikram: 85%.
What the research calls it
Attachment theory (Bowlby; Ainsworth; Hazan & Shaver)

Carrying the reaching-out

When one person consistently does the work of checking in, re-initiating, and reassuring, it can reflect an effort to hold the connection steady against uncertainty.

In your chat

You send 13 messages during his 5 silences, initiate 9 of 14 conversations, and your median reply is 4 minutes against his 4 hours 55 minutes. You ask 'how was your day' with no matching question back, and you say 'it's ok' after his missed plans with no comparable line from him.

What would change our reading

A stretch where he initiates more than you, or checks in during a gap you created, would shift this. That isn't in the 45 messages.

If you want to read more: Attached (Amir Levine and Rachel Heller, 2010); A Secure Base (John Bowlby, 1988).

This is shown because the same counting applied to you as to him; it's not a verdict on either of you.